Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Reynolds

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1891No. 14555PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

The plaintiff was convicted in a justice’s court of the violation of a municipal ordinance of the city of San José-, and sentenced to paya fine of thirty dollars, or be imprisoned in the city prison for thirty days. He appealed the case to the superior court of the county, where the judgment was reversed and a new trial granted. Thereafter the case was set down for trial in that department of the superior court of which the defendant herein was judge. When the case was set, the defendant, plaintiff here, demanded a trial by jury, but the judge of the court denied the demand, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Vanderhurst v. TholckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. In re FifeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Carrion v. GonzalezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API