Legal Opinion
People v. Oliver
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1948No. Civ. 13753PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The District Attorney of Contra Costa County brought this action to abate as a public nuisance certain structures and materials located on premises owned by Xoral Oliver and her daughter, Carol Borges. The court adjudged that a certain elevated structure and certain piles of lumber and waste materials on the property constituted a public nuisance, and defendants were directed to remove the same within 90 days. From this judgment defendants appeal, contending that the findings are not supported, and that, as a matter of law, the conditions shown to exist do not constitute a public nuisance.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dean v. Powell Undertaking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- McCloskey v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Siskiyou Lumber & Mercantile Co. v. RostelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Liebman v. RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Biber v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oliver v. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Tarlton v. KaufmanMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Salazar v. MaradeagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- County of San Diego v. CarlstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.