Legal Opinion
Berquist v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 13, 1922No. 10345PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover the sum of $500 for commission for procuring a purchaser for certain real estate.
The petition alleged E. T. Bynum was the duly authorized agent of defendant, and pursuant to her instructions listed the property, being a farm, with plaintiff for sale at $8,500 cash net. That plaintiff procured Charles O. Rhoades, who agreed to purchase the land from the defendant for the sum of $9,000 cash. That defendant entered into a written contract with Rhoades for the sale of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilliland v. JaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Brake v. BlainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Pliler v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Kelly v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- McCartney v. ShoresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Letcher v. SkiverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Republic Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. First State Bank of OiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Carignano v. BoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Loveland v. LoafmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Beindorf v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.