Legal Opinion
Beindorf v. Thorpe
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 4, 1927No. 17275PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
This action was filed in the district court of Caddo county;, June 26, 1917, and plaintiff, Charles Bern- dorf, prays that a deed, absolute on its face, be declared a mortgage; prays an accounting for rents and profits, and that he be permitted to redeem the lands.
Pearl O. Thorpe and Mayme Wyatt, defendants, are the heirs of Hiram T. Dayton, deceased.
This is the third time this case has been before this court. Beindorf v. Thorpe et al., 77 Okla. 229; 188 Pac. 102; 90 Okla. 191, 203 Pac. 475. And in Beindorf v. Thorpe et al., 90 Okla. 191, 203 Pac. 475, this court held the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Berquist v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Citizens' Bank of Wakita v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Thompson v. HashbargerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Beindorf v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cooling v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Ada Resources v. Don Chamblin & AssociatesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Eason Oil Co. v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Sarah Sitlington and Thomas O. Sitlington v. Robert Fulton and Ruby May FultonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Templet v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.