Legal Opinion

McCartney v. Shores

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1920No. 9495PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from County court, Tulsa County; H. L. Standeven, Judge. Action by J. A. Shores against A. J. McCartney. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.

J. A. Shores instituted ah action against A. J. McCartney for the recovery of commissions for the sale of certain property. The plaintiff was engaged in the real estate business in the city of Tulsa, Okla. The defendant was a resident of Tulsa and the owner of a residence located in that city. The parties entered into an oral agreement whereby McCartney listed with Shores his residence in the city of Tulsa for sale or trade, and agreed to pay plaintiff $60 as a commission for his services in selling or assisting in the selling or trading of the property so listed. Subsequent to their oral…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Francis v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Kalley v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Scully v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Moore v. IrwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berquist v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Pliler v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Campbell v. Thomas-Godfrey Land & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Scott v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API