Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Republic Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. First State Bank of Oilton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1925No. 14919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion toy

RUTH, C.

The plaintiff, First State Bank of Oilton, hied its action against the defendants, Riverside Oil & Refining Company and M. D. Harris, to recover judgment on six promissory notes of $1,000 each, alleged to have been executed on February 20, 1922, by the oil company in favor of Harris and indorsed by Harris for value, before maturity, and without notice of any infirmities, to the plaintiff.

By leave of the court, plaintiff filed its amended petition and the oil company filed its verified answer, and by leave of the court subsequently filed a verified amended answer, consisting…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hunter Realty Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Richardson v. FellnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  5. Powers v. RudeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Knupp v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Nonnamaker v. Kay County Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WidickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Sharp v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API