Gilliland v. Jaynes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Earrar L■ McCain, Judge. Action by John T. Jaynes against J. W. Gilliland for a commission for the sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
AMES, C.
The first error assigned and dis cussed is the action of the court in refusing a peremptory instruction, and the position of the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, is thus stated in his brief:
“We maintain, first, that a binding contract whereby the plaintiff was to sell property of the defendant as the defendant’s agent was not proven at the trial; second, that, if the plaintiff was acting as the agent of the defendant in the sale of defendant’s property, the interest which he would have acquired in the purchased property was antagonistic to the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Rice v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Francis v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Henry S. Grinde Corporation v. KlindworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Berquist v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- J. R. Fulton, D/B/A J. R. Fulton & Company v. L & N Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Littlefield v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.