Legal Opinion

Gilliland v. Jaynes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1912No. 2128PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Earrar L■ McCain, Judge. Action by John T. Jaynes against J. W. Gilliland for a commission for the sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

AMES, C.

The first error assigned and dis cussed is the action of the court in refusing a peremptory instruction, and the position of the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, is thus stated in his brief:

“We maintain, first, that a binding contract whereby the plaintiff was to sell property of the defendant as the defendant’s agent was not proven at the trial; second, that, if the plaintiff was acting as the agent of the defendant in the sale of defendant’s property, the interest which he would have acquired in the purchased property was antagonistic to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Rice v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Francis v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Henry S. Grinde Corporation v. KlindworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Berquist v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. J. R. Fulton, D/B/A J. R. Fulton & Company v. L & N Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Littlefield v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API