Ottman v. Fadden
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
In a common law defamation action brought against a former employer, Thomas W. Ottman argues his claims have only a tenuous link to his employment and thus, are not subject to the compulsory arbitration provision of the securities industry standard U-4 registration agreement. Finding the employer’s two allegedly defamatory internal memoranda related to Ottman’s professional status and his performance as a stockbroker, the trial court granted the employer’s motion to compel arbitration. Ottman filed his statement of claim with the National Association of Securities Dealers…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- 301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Champion Auto Sales, LLC v. Polaris Sales Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Stiglich Construction, Inc. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Alexander v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.