Legal Opinion

Stiglich Construction, Inc. v. Larson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 2001No. C6-00-1190PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge

Appellant Stiglich Construction, Inc., brought a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action against respondent Vernet B. Larson, III. The parties arbitrated the contract dispute and appellant then moved the district court to award attorney fees incurred in the arbitration. The district court ruled that appellant waived its right to arbitration attorney fees by failing to request them in the arbitration. Because appellant properly reserved its right to request attorney fees in the district court mechanic’s lien foreclosure, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

General contractor Stiglich…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Obraske v. WoodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Sentry Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. Mariner's Cay Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Harris v. DyerOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Churchill Environmental & Industrial Equity Partners, L.P. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Robert W. Carlstrom Co. v. German Evangelical Lutheran St. Paul's Congregation of the Unaltered Augsburg Confession at JordanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Allan Block Corp. v. County Materials Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006
  5. CHURCHILL ENVIR. PARTNERS v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API