Legal Opinion

Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 2003No. A03-109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from summary judgment in a dispute as to the amount that insurers must pay for automobile glass repair and replacement services performed on behalf of the insureds. The companies that performed these repairs challenge the district court determination that they were required to arbitrate the claims and that each claim must be separately arbitrated. The insurers contend in a notice of review that the district court erred in requiring that these individual arbitrations take place before the same panel of three arbitrators. We affirm the decision that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Grover-Dimond Associates, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Marzitelli v. City of Little CanadaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Southwell v. ChamberlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Delacy Investments, Inc. v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API