Legal Opinion

City of El Cajon v. Heath

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1948No. Civ. 3681PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUSSELL, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants in an action brought by the plaintiff city of El Cajon to enjoin the defendants from discharging sewage into the sewer system and disposal plant of the plaintiff and for the reasonable value of sewage disposal services rendered.

The city of El Cajon is a municipal corporation of the sixth class and owns and operates a municipal sewage disposal system. The defendants own a portion of Lot 10 of Ardell Acres in San Diego County, which property is contiguous to the city limits. In 1929, under the provisions of the “Improvement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pass Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Hollywood City Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Federal Construction Co. v. EnsignCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Pixley v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Harter v. BarkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jefferson Union School District v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. City of South San Francisco v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Mountain View Union High School District v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Vine Street Commercial Partnership v. City of MarysvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. VINE ST. COMMERCIAL PTNSHP. v. MarysvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API