Harter v. Barkley
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Appeal from a judgment entered after a demurrer to a petition for writ of mandate had been sustained without leave to amend.
The matter involved is the validity or invalidity of a certain ordinance of the city of Redondo Beach. The petitioner alleged the existence of a public sewer in front of his property in said city; and after reciting the pertinent provisions of the ordinance above mentioned, averred that he applied to the trustees of Redondo Beach and the plumbing inspector of said city offered to make connections between his property and said public sewer in a manner and with materials…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ex Parte LemonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re ZhizhuzzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Ex Parte McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Nourse v. City of RussellvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- City of National City v. FritzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Carlton Santee Corp. v. Padre Dam Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Southern Pacific R.R. Co. v. StibbensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.