Legal Opinion
City of South San Francisco v. Berry
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1953No. Civ. 15508PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
According to the amended complaint, the county of San Mateo, in June, 1945, issued to defendant Luther E. Berry a permit to construct a single family residence on a certain parcel of land which by and pursuant to the land use ordinances of the county had been classified as residential and limited to single family dwellings; on August 19, 1946, this parcel of land, with other lands, was annexed to and made a part of the city of South San Francisco ; the permittee and his wife Christine Berry have constructed a building for use by more than one family and have permitted three…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Sanitary Bd. of E. Fruitvale Sanitary Dist.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- In Re KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- City of El Cajon v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
3Cited by15 opinions
- John Teixeira v. County of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Dublin v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Esling v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- County of Santa Clara v. CurtnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.