Pass Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Hollywood City Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought to quiet title to a piece of land and the schoolhouse thereon formerly within the limits of plaintiff school district and used by the district for public school purposes. Judgment passed for defendant school district, and from that judgment and from the order denying its motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals.
The facts are stipulated, subject, as to some of them, to objections touching their admissibility. From these facts it appears that plaintiff for many years past has been and still is a school district of Los Angeles County. In 1889, the real property in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ober v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hughes v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Winona v. School-District, No. 82Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- State Board of Education v. HonigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- California Teachers Assn. v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.