Legal Opinion

In Re Dissolution of Parkstone Apartment Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1928No. Docket No. 160, Calendar No. 33,711PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

The Union Trust Company is receiver for the Parkstone Apartment Company, a Michigan corporation. Certain creditors commenced reclamation proceedings. The Netting Company, for lighting-fixtures and equipment, and for miscellaneous mer chandise; the Murphy Wall Bed Company for wall beds; the J. E. Stephens Company for kitchen equipment; the Detroit Canvas Company for awnings; the Huebner Screen Door Company for door and window screens; and the A. • J. Marshall Company for dishes and dining room equipment.

All the contracts which constitute the basis of the several reclamation proceedings were in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Federal Commercial & Savings Bank v. International Clay MacHinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Contractors Equipment Co. v. ReasnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Thomas Spacing Machine Co. v. Security Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mundhenk v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Harris-Seybold-Potter Co. v. WhitelawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  3. Alger v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Grand Rapids Electrotype Co. v. Powers-Tyson Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. McKey v. Troy Laundry Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API