Young v. Phillips
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Davis, J., presiding. Replevin in justice’s court by Mathew A. Young against Andrew T. Phillips and another for the possession of an automobile. There was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Kuhn, J.
The motion for rehearing was granted in this case because of the claim made that the tests announced in Atkinson v. Japink, 186 Mich. 335, were wrongly applied to the contract here in question, and that the rule announced in the opinion in this case (202 Mich. 480) was in conflict with previous adjudications of the law of conditional sales by this court. Counsel representing other interests than those immediately involved have been permitted to file briefs as amici curias, and the various contentions advanced by counsel have been fully argued and ably briefed. In our…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People ex rel. Farrington v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Button v. TraderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Cadwell v. PrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Powers v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Nelson v. ViergiverMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Studebaker Bros. Co. of Utah v. WitcherNevada Supreme Court · 1921
- Peter Schuttler Co. v. GuntherMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.