Legal Opinion
Mundhenk v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1945No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 42,932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
On June 9, 1942, Charles E. Mund-henk, plaintiff, purchased on a title-retention contract from Charles Mayhew and wife, coplaintiffs, a restaurant with equipment and fixtures in Chelsea, Michigan. The contract was duly filed June 15, 1942. It showed an unpaid balance of $1,700.
Paul P. Niehaus, in addition to working for a bank at Chelsea, Michigan, wrote fire insurance for the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company, Ltd., the defendant, and also for two other companies. Defendant furnished Niehaus with a bronze sign, which he placed in the window of the space occupied by him at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Angell v. . Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Kino v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Stadler v. CiprianMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Coverdill v. Northern Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ortiz v. Travelers Insurance Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Root v. Republic InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lieberman v. SolomonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Fenner v. Bolema Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Hastings Mutual Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.