Legal Opinion

Contractors Equipment Co. v. Reasner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff delivered to Bert Guilford a tractor under the following agreement:

“This agreement made this 8th day of October, A. D. 1925, by and between Contractors Equipment Company, Inc., of the city of Detroit, 5163 Martin ave., party of the first part, and Bert Guilford of the city of St. Helen, Michigan, party of the second part. Witnesseth, first: That the said party of the first part shall and will sell to said second party, the following described property, to-wit: One, only (used) 10-ton Holt tractor; one, only Port Huron trailer, $2,000, upon and after full payment therefor by said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Nelson v. ViergiverMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Powers v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Sherman v. Flint Trolley Coach, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re Dissolution of Parkstone Apartment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Mills Novelty Co. v. MorettMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Harris-Seybold-Potter Co. v. WhitelawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API