Legal Opinion
Federal Commercial & Savings Bank v. International Clay MacHinery Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1925No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
On March 21, 1922, defendant Schriner Brick Company ordered from defendant International Clay Machinery Company a brick machine, which was received in due course. The part of the order here material is:
“For which we agree to pay eleven hundred dollars and freight from Dayton, Ohio, or factory where made as follows: Four hundred dollars from date of shipment against bill of lading. Three hundred and sixty dollars in 60 days from shipment. Three hundred and forty dollars in 90 days from shipment. Deferred payments to be evidenced by trade acceptances.
“It is agreed that all the above specified…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Bryant v. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Bunday v. Columbus Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Peter Schuttler Co. v. GuntherMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Merchants National Bank of St. Paul v. Santa Maria Sugar Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Powers v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Kolb v. Golden Rule Baking Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1928
- Contractors Equipment Co. v. ReasnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Lynch v. National Acceptance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Galion Iron Works & Manfg. Co. v. Service Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.