In Re Estate of Brady
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, George Beebe, Deputy Attorney-General, and John T. Nourse, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellant. Henry T. Gage, W. I. Foley, O’Melveny, Stevens & Millikin, J. Wiseman Macdonald, Haas & Dunnigan, Hunsaker & Britt, and Lewinsohn & Kline, Amici Curiae, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an appeal by the state of California from the portion of the decree of final distribution of the estate of William Brady, deceased, which adjudges that one-half of the property of said deceased be distributed to certain persons bearing thé relationship of brother or sister, or descendants of such, to Harriet Hayes Brady, the predeceased wife of said William Brady. The other half of said property was distributed to the state of California, subject to the provisions of title VIII, part III, of the Code of Civil Procedure, and all other provisions of the statutes of the state relative to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Estate of GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Estate of McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re Esate of CudworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Schuyler v. BroughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bambridge v. WestermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of RattrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Estate of RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Randall v. Department of InstitutionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.