Nilson v. Sarment
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is an action to quiet title to a parcel of land in the city of Oakland. The complaint alleges that plaintiff and Emma Christina Nilson were married in 1877, and ever since have been husband and wife; that in July, 1884, plaintiff purchased the land in question from one John Ziegenbein; that the deed from Ziegenbein named Emma Christina Nilson as sole grantee, but that the whole consideration for the conveyance was paid by plaintiff out of moneys earned by him during his marriage, and that the deed was taken in the name of Emma Christina Nilson, as grantee, for the marital community of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People ex rel. Stratton v. OultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- MacLeod v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Rozan v. RozanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- DeBoer v. DeBoerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hammond v. McColloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.