Legal Opinion

Central Bank v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1955No. S. F. 19176PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

— This is an application for the writ of prohibition to prevent the respondent superior court from taking further action in a guardianship matter in which it indicated that in the exercise of its probate jurisdiction it would require the petitioner Central Bank to account for $4,011.71, deposited therein by the guardian in her personal account.

In 1949 in a regular proceeding in the respondent court sitting in probate, Bennie L. Perry, the mother of Sam Perry, a minor, was duly appointed and qualified as the guardian of his person and estate, and furnished the required bond. Thereafter the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Koppikus v. State Capitol Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Bauer v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Woods v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Estate of BaglioneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. City of Downey v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API