Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Shultz

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1951No. Civ. 17785, 18075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendants from an adverse judgment in an action seeking cancellation of two leases of real property and a bill of sale of personal property on the ground of false and fraudulent representations allegedly made by defendants with respect to the income received from the operation, of the leased premises immediately preceding plaintiff’s occupancy.

On January 15, 1949, defendants, as lessors and owners of a 30-room hotel and an adjoining cottage at Catalina Island, entered into two five-year leases with plaintiff, as lessee, one for the hotel, the other for the cottage.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. WardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Dyke v. ZaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Chamberlain v. WakefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Costello v. RoerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Spencer v. DeemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M. G. Chamberlain & Co. v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Rogers v. Bill & Vince's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Mariani v. SchonfeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API