Legal Opinion

Costello v. Roer

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1946No. Civ. 15319PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The present action is one seeking rescission, on the ground of fraud, of a contract involving the purchase of a hotel business operated by appellant and sold to the respondents. The record discloses that negotiations therefor were commenced about September 24, 1943, culminating in a written agreement of sale dated September 30, 1943, under which the lease, equipment, etc. of the St. Mark’s Hotel in Venice, California, were sold to respondents for $17,500 payable $7,000 down, balance in monthly installments. Respondents gave appellant a cashier’s check for $5,000 which was duly paid and two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Watson v. PooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Oppenheimer v. ClunieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. French v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. County of Kern v. GinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. O'Connell Home Builders, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Turner v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Wood v. KalbaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API