Legal Opinion

Harpke v. Lankershim Estate

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1950No. Civ. 17981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment entered pursuant to the order made upon the sustaining of respondents’ demurrer to appellant’s complaint. The action is one in equity to set aside a judgment for costs and disbursements awarded respondents in a previous suit wherein plaintiff was nonsuited. The basis of the instant action is the allegation that respondents committed a fraud upon appellant in the former case by the declaration in the cost bill that $159.25 in costs and disbursements had been incurred be the respondents whereas in fact the latter’s insurer had paid such expenses, as it alone had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Horton v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Doran v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DeMello v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Myers v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Page v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Muller v. ReaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Perry v. ZabriskieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API