Legal Opinion
Doran v. Sherman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 1937No. Civ. 10054PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Respondent obtained a judgment in the Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco against appellant for $500 damages in a personal injuries action; and thereafter appellant commenced the present suit in equity in the superior court to annul said judgment, claiming that the judgment was void for want of jurisdiction to hear and determine the action. The superior court sustained respondent’s demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend, and from the order entered in that behalf appellant has taken this appeal. In our opinion the appeal is wholly without merit.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Fitzpatrick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Rittersbacher v. Bd. of Supervisors of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hogan v. HorsfallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Muller v. ReaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Harpke v. Lankershim EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Madsen v. Turlock Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Beckjord v. SlusherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- General Distillers, Ltd. v. Wholesale Liquor Drivers-Salesmen Union, Local 109California Court of Appeal · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.