Legal Opinion

Perry v. Zabriskie

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1966No. Civ. No. 30376PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Invoking the court’s equity power, plaintiffs Perry commenced this action in May of 1965 to set aside a default judgment obtained by the defendants Zabriskie in February of that year involving the sale of a business assertedly obtained by fraud; their default had previously been taken in December of 1963. The gist of the present proceeding is that plaintiffs were lulled into a sense of false security by an attorney for the Zabriskies in the former action; thus, acting on his representations to their then attorney that matters would be held in abeyance until written demand for an appearance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hallett v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Vallejo v. Montebello Sewer Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Bartell v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howe v. Pioneer Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API