Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. BPS Guard Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1994No. C3-94-973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Commissioner’s denial of reemployment insurance benefits. The employee asserts that a demotion provided good cause to quit. Because the demotion resulted from the employee’s misconduct, we affirm the Commissioner’s denial.

FACTS

BPS Guard Services employed Phillip Goodwin as a security officer supervisor. In October 1993 Goodwin failed to report for his assigned shift three times. An employee’s unreported absence is grounds for termination from employment with BPS.

In early November, a BPS personnel specialist informed Goodwin that he was being…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Marty v. Digital Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. TuneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Midland Electric, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. SecretNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cook v. PlayworksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Vasseei v. Schmitty & Sons School Buses Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API