Legal Opinion
Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 17, 1991No. C8-91-971PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Relator Janice Polley obtained a writ of certiorari, seeking review of the respondent Commissioner’s denial of her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. Polley claims the Commissioner erred by determining that she did not have good cause to quit her job with respondent Gopher Bearing Company. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
Polley began working for respondent Gopher Bearing Company (Gopher) in 1983 as an accounts payable clerk. In 1987, Gopher promoted Polley to a billing clerk position.
Polley took a maternity leave while she was an accounts payable clerk, and another…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lisa Marz v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. AsperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hendrickson v. Northfield CleanersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goodwin v. BPS Guard Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Thao v. Command Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991