Legal Opinion

Roelofs v. Baber

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1935No. 30,256PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Action for the wrongful death of the six-year old daughter of plaintiff, who. sues as the special administrator of her estate. There was a verdict for plaintiff, but for only $200. His motion for a new trial Avas denied on condition that defendants consent to an increase of the verdict to $1,250. Such consent not forthcoming, the result was an order for a neAV trial, from Avhich defendants appeal.

Had defendants consented to an increased verdict, plaintiff Avould have been in a position to question the constitutional power of the court so to alloAv an increase of the damages…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. McKenzie v. Bismarck Water Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Genzel v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Laramie Motors, Inc. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Petersen v. PetersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Fortier v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API