Legal Opinion

Dorman v. Simpson

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided June 8, 1995No. 1:94-cv-02568PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HULL, District Judge.

On September 23, 1994, Frank S. Dorman (“Plaintiff’), currently an inmate at the United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, filed this Complaint [1-1], alleging that Defendants violated his due process rights by conducting Plaintiffs federal parole revocation hearing in Georgia as opposed to New York. All Defendants are federal actors and thus the Court treats Plaintiffs Complaint as one brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

This is at least Plaintiffs third time in…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Akeem Washington v. Shannon RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Gant v. United States Probation OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998
  3. Williams v. Lear Operations Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1999
  4. Davis v. DotsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API