Legal Opinion

Haines v. Bechdolt

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1965No. Civ. 10785PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment for defendants in his action for architectural services. There was a written instrument signed between the parties for the design by plaintiff of a motel addition to defendants’ Tahoe Inn. Plaintiff sued on this contract but also sued on a quantum meruit for the value of services performed and upon an account stated. A defense raised by defendants was that there had been a collateral oral contract entered into between the parties under which it had been agreed “that plaintiff would assist in the obtaining of needed financing for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Fontana v. UppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Gleeson v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Paratore v. ScharetgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Water Resources v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Banco Do Brasil, S.A. v. Latian, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Canales v. City of AlvisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Teamsters, Local 396 v. Nasa Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. WhitlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Jewel Companies v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API