Legal Opinion
Paratore v. Scharetg
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1942No. Civ. 11925PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants in an action for breach of a building contract.
The contract is in the printed form used generally by building contractors in San Francisco; it is dated October 5, 1939, and provides that plaintiff “within the space of one hundred twenty working days from and after the date of recording this contract” (emphasis ours) furnish labor and materials and complete the construction of three buildings on a certain parcel of land owned by defendants, for which he was to receive the sum of $26,490. The. above italicized words were not a part…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- P. A. Smith Co. v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Cooper v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hanrahan-Wilcox Corp. v. Jenison MacHinery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Alameda County Title Insurance v. PanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Earp v. NobmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Teamsters, Local 396 v. Nasa Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Louis Lesser Enterprises, Ltd. v. RoederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Fontana v. UppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.