Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. Whitlow

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1966No. Civ. 11131PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Included in 82 and a fraction acres of defendants’ (Whitlows’) lands condemned by the state were 37.55 acres already under lease to the state. The jury found the fair market value of all land taken to be $67,110 with no severance damages to adjoining land not taken; it also found $12,034 as the value of the leasehold interests already owned by the state, leaving a net recoverable sum of $55,076. The Whitlows’ appeal raises this contention: Nothing should have been deducted from the state’s leasehold interests which (appellants urge) became “merged with the fee” at the time of the filing of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Happy Investment Group v. Lakeworld Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1975
  3. San Bernardino County Flood Control District v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. ArthoferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API