Tidlund v. Seven Up Bottling Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
Plaintiff sued two defendants—the bottler and the retail vendor of a bottle of Seven Up—for breach of warranty of merchantability and fitness for intended use. The jury returned a verdict in favor of both defendants, and plaintiff has appealed from the judgment and from the order denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
According to plaintiff’s testimony, on May 20, 1955, she opened a fresh bottle of Seven Up which she had allegedly purchased from defendant Jack Huey. She stated that she poured half of the contents into a glass and proceeded to drink it, noticing nothing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thayer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Castro v. Fowler Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Holland v. Morgan & Peacock Properties Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Chaparkas v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Espinoza v. RossiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.