Holland v. Morgan & Peacock Properties Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action upon an oral agreement for the sharing between brokers of commissions upon the sale of real estate. Judgment was entered on jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $53,791.66. Defendants appeal.
Appellants urge insufficiency of the evidence to support verdict and judgment. In passing upon this contention an appellate court determines only whether there is substantial evidence to support the judgment, resolving all conflicts and indulging all reasonable inferences in favor of the conclusion of the jury. (Tidlund v. Seven Up Bottling Co., 154 Cal.App.2d 663, 665…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Gorham v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- California Auto Court Association v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Phillippe v. Shapell Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1987
- Jaffe v. Albertson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Preach v. Monter RainbowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.