Legal Opinion

Sletto v. Wesley Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 2007No. A06-1413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

After discovering mold and water damage in their house, the homeowners filed statutory-warranty and common-law negli gence claims against the homebuilder. The district court concluded that the statute limiting actions arising from real-property improvements barred the suit and granted summary judgment against all of the homeowners’ claims. Because the 2004 amendment to the statute does not extinguish the homeowners’ statutory-warranty claim, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

Mark and Laura Sletto purchased a house in Rosemount from John and Linda Stark…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Day Masonry v. Independent School District 347Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Lamprey v. Britton Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  3. Gomez v. David A. Williams Realty & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite RE, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API