Sletto v. Wesley Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
After discovering mold and water damage in their house, the homeowners filed statutory-warranty and common-law negli gence claims against the homebuilder. The district court concluded that the statute limiting actions arising from real-property improvements barred the suit and granted summary judgment against all of the homeowners’ claims. Because the 2004 amendment to the statute does not extinguish the homeowners’ statutory-warranty claim, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
Mark and Laura Sletto purchased a house in Rosemount from John and Linda Stark…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Day Masonry v. Independent School District 347Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Lamprey v. Britton Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Gomez v. David A. Williams Realty & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite RE, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.