Legal Opinion

Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite RE, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 2012No. A12-1017PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.*

Appellants challenge the summary judgment dismissing their claims against respondent, arguing that the district court erred by concluding that (1) appellants were not intended third-party beneficiaries of a surety bond issued by respondent; and (2) the surety bond’s one-year limitations period was not tolled as to the surety by the bond principal’s fraudulent coneeal*213ment of a cause of action. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Appellants1 (the funds) are “multi-em-ployer, jointly-trusteed employee benefit plans” that collect funds on behalf of union…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Williamson v. PrasciunasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite Re, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API