Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite RE, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.*
Appellants challenge the summary judgment dismissing their claims against respondent, arguing that the district court erred by concluding that (1) appellants were not intended third-party beneficiaries of a surety bond issued by respondent; and (2) the surety bond’s one-year limitations period was not tolled as to the surety by the bond principal’s fraudulent coneeal*213ment of a cause of action. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
Appellants1 (the funds) are “multi-em-ployer, jointly-trusteed employee benefit plans” that collect funds on behalf of union…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Williamson v. PrasciunasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite Re, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014