Legal Opinion
Day Masonry v. Independent School District 347
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 15, 2010No. A08-929PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
This action arises from alleged defects in the construction of Willmar High School, which opened in 1994. In 2006, respondent Independent School District 347 (School District) commenced an arbitration proceeding against appellants, Lov-ering-Johnson Construction (Lovering-Johnson), Commercial Roofing, Inc. (Commercial Roofing), and GenFlex Roofing Systems, LLP (GenFlex), which were contractors or suppliers on the project. The School District asserted claims based on express written warranties and other non-warranty claims. Lovering-Johnson joined appellant Day Masonry…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In the Matter of REICHMANN LAND AND CATTLE, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- 328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Douglas A. Kelley v. Gus BoosalisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- John C. Abajian, M.D. and Margaret C. Abajian v. TruexCullins, Inc. and Thermal Efficiency Construction, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Webb Golden Valley, LLC, Evelyn Thomson v. State of Minnesota, Global One Golden Valley, LLC, Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.