Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Bales

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1901No. 4041PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William O. Ci-iapman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Tho opinion of the court was delivered hy

Hadley, J.

Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason that no transcript of the record was prepared, certified, and filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court at or before the time when the appellant served and filed his opening brief, as provided hy § 2, p.,29, Laws 1901. The notice of appeal was served July 30, 1901. The transcript was certified and filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court on the 16th day of August, 1901. Thus appellant had caused the transcript to he certified and filed long before the expiration…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. McCarthy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. De Voe v. RundleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. White v. KrutzWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Consolidated National Bank of Tucson v. Van SlykeArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Boyer v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Chapin v. City of Port AngelesWashington Supreme Court · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API