Consolidated National Bank of Tucson v. Van Slyke
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
— On February 16, 1912, one Roy Sibley executed a mortgage on certain unpatented mining claims in Pinal county to secure the payment of four notes, due, respectively, June 15, 1912, September 1, 1912, December 15, 1912, and February 14, 1913 in favor of A. Kegal and E. C. Taylor. On the same date he deeded the claims to Calumet & Copper Creek Mining Company, a corporation. On November 16, 1914, a judgment against the corporation was obtained and docketed by Leo G-oldschmidt, which was afterwards assigned to the Consolidated National Bank of Tucson, one of the defendants herein. On November 4,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Blackford v. NeavesArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Wooster v. ScorseArizona Supreme Court · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Smith v. BushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Guleserian v. FieldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Button v. WakelinArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Holland Bank v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.