Legal Opinion

Chapin v. City of Port Angeles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1903No. 4209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Clallam County. — Hon. Geobge C. Hatch, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*537The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

— Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal under § 2, p. 29 of the Session Laws of 1901, which requires a transcript to be prepared, certified, and filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court, at or before the time when appellant shall serve and file his opening brief. Appellants’ opening brief and transcript were both filed on the 14th day of February, 1902. The motion to dismiss the appeal appears to have been served the same day, and seems to have been filed with the clerk of the superior court as well as in this court. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townsend Gas & Electric Light Co. v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State ex rel. King v. TrimbellWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Raymond v. BalesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Prescott v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State v. HeadleeWashington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. BardinWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State ex rel. Lewis v. HodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. Middle Kittitas Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Weiffenbach v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Dean v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API