Legal Opinion

White v. Krutz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1905No. 4794PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Rudkin, J., entered March 4, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, decreeing the foreclosure of a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On December 3, 1891, the defendant, Mary J. McMillan, executed and delivered to the Solicitors Loan & Trust Company her promissory note for $700, securing the same by mortgage on certain lots in the city of Forth Yakima. The debt matured, by the terms of the contract, on January 1, 1895. On the day last named the Solicitors Loan & Trust. Company, being then the owner and holder of the note and mortgage, entered into a written agreement with the mortgagor and the defendants, John Stone and Emma Stone, who had acquired an interest in the mortgaged property, to the effect that the time of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. George v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hanna v. KassonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. First National Bank v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Raymond v. BalesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Denny v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. NaherWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. AAC CORPORATION v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Coman v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Perkins v. SwainIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Keene v. ZindorfWashington Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API