Legal Opinion

In re Rayna M.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 15, 1987No. 5612PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

This appeal involves three separate petitions to terminate the parental rights of the parents of three children, brought pursuant to General Statutes § 17-43a1 by the commissioner of the department *25of children and youth services (hereinafter DCYS). The three petitions were considered jointly by the trial court. DCYS appeals from that court’s denial of the petitions. We find error.

The three petitions filed by DCYS on February 27, 1986 sought to terminate the parental rights of Kathie M., the mother of Rayna M., a daughter aged seven *26at the time the petitions were filed, Cheyanne K., a daughter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  3. Juvenile Appeal v. Commissioner of Children & Youth ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. In Re Juvenile Appeal (84-3)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  5. In re Juvenile AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. In re Michael M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. In re Kezia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. In re Barbara J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. In re Drew R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. In re Joshua Z.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API