In re Kezia M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
This is an appeal by the respondent father and paternal grandmother1 from the judgment of the trial court terminating the father’s parental rights with respect to his minor daughter, Kezia, pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-112 (b) (1), (3) and (4).2
*14On appeal, the respondents argue that the trial court improperly concluded (1) that there was sufficient evidence to support the termination order on the grounds set out in General Statutes § 17a-112 (b) (1), (3) and (4), and (2) that the commissioner of the department of children and youth services (DCYS) had made reasonable efforts to unite…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Juvenile Appeal v. Commissioner of Children & Youth ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- In Re Juvenile Appeal (84-3)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- In re Roshawn R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- In re Bruce R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- In re Christina V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In re Shyliesh H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Eden F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.