Legal Opinion
In re Michael M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 15, 1992No. 10577PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
This is an appeal by the respondent, Gwendolyn M., from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her children, Michael and Mamie M., pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 17-43a (b) (1), (2) and (4) (now § 17a-112).1 The trial court found that the allegations in the petitions for termination had been proven by clear and convincing evidence and that it was in the best interest of each child that the parental rights of the respondent be terminated.2
On appeal, the respondent claims that: (1) the petitioner did not properly plead abandonment on the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In re Kezia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- In re TabithaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In re Hector L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.