Legal Opinion
In re Joshua Z.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 15, 1991No. 9863PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
At issue in this case is the termination of the parental rights of the respondent mother pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-112 (b) (2) and (4).1 The *60respondent mother2 claims (1) that the trial court improperly terminated her parental rights because there was no finding by that court that her child, Joshua Z., would be in immediate physical danger if returned to her, and (2) that the trial court’s decision was not supported by clear and convincing evidence as required by § 17a-112. We disagree.
The evidence presented to the trial court revealed that Joshua was born on April 3, 1988. He has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- In re Juvenile Appeal (83-CD)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Anonymous v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Mark C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- In re Shyina B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re A.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Interest of Elsa F., (Jul. 11, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- In Re AGDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.