Legal Opinion

Morrissey v. Haley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1993No. 20138PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDING

A parcel of land owned by Ann Morrissey in Ketchum, Idaho (“Lot 2”) is situated immediately north of the parcel owned by the estate of Rosemary Haley (“Lot 3”). 1 In 1976, then-owner of Lot 2 (Mike Congdon) and then-owner of Lot 3 (Thomas Drougas) agreed to construct a fence on what they believed to be the boundary between the parcels, based on Congdon’s research of the lot lines. The parties stipulated that Cong-don and Drougas then agreed that this fence, constructed in 1976, constituted the boundary between the two properties. Drougas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. WashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Beneficial Life Ins. Co. v. WakamatsuIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Tolmie Farms, Inc. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wells v. WilliamsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown v. PerkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cameron v. NealIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Luce v. MarbleIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. FLYING ELK INVESTMENT, LLC v. CornwallIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API