Legal Opinion

Davis v. Peacock

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1999No. 24463PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This case involves an appeal from an order for summary judgment granting Raymond and Marybel Davis (Davises) an easement across land owned by Arnold Peacock (Peacock). Peacock argues that the trial court incorrectly applied the law to this case and therefore summary judgment in favor of the Davises was improper. Because we believe that the law was correctly applied and that summary judgment was proper, we affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Davises are owners of real property situated in Kootenai County. Peacock owns property located to the north of the Davis…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Story v. HefnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Idah-Best, Inc. v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Loomis v. City of HaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Intermountain Forest Management, Inc. v. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Opportunity, L.L.C. v. OssewardeIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hughes v. George B. Fisher, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Akers v. D.L. White Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API