Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brown v. Perkins

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1996No. 21517PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

This is an action seeking the enforcement of restrictive covenants applicable to a residential subdivision.

I

BACKGROUND

The following facts are not in dispute. Appellants, Booker Brown and Pamela J. Selland-Brown (the Browns), and respondents, Andrew B. Artis and Julie J. Artis (the Artises) own adjacent lots in the Trolley Estate Subdivision (the Subdivision), in Ada County. The Browns own lot 27, and the Artises own lot 26. The Artises’ home was built on lot 26 by respondent, John H. Perkins (Perkins).

All homes in the Subdivision are subject to a set of restrictive…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Clark v. St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance CompaniesIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Chubbuck v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Loomis v. City of HaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mitchell v. Zilog, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Shawver v. Huckleberry Estates, L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Intermountain Forest Management, Inc. v. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pinehaven Planning Board v. BrooksIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API